“Do all men kill the things they do not
love?” IV.I.66
In Merchant
of Venice, the desire for materialism (is back again!) presents itself
entangled among other desires, but this time it’s slightly more complicated. The
play starts off with longing, through Antonio’s unhappiness: “In sooth know not
why I am so sad,” but “my merchandise makes me not sad. I.I. 45.” Antonio has
wealth (material), but is lacking something he desires on another level – love
(emotional). His self-pity and depressive characteristics are put aside when
Bassanio, in desperate need of money, comes to him for a loan. Antonio has an
ambiguous connection with Bassanio that is so strong he is willing to risk a
pound of his own flesh for him to retrieve the money, showing the value the
character sets on relationships. But! Antonio will only loan Bassanio money if he pursues it for the Love for Portia, not just for her
family wealth. In this way, Antonio’s character is representing emotional over
superficial possessions.
Thickening the plot, Antonio is anti-Semitic,
conflicting drastically with the Jewish Shylock that raises desire differences
within and between religions. The play goes further to reveal a stereotype of the
Christian characters (Antonio) valuing relationships through love and
reoccurring theme of marriage, while the Jewish (Shylock) valuing material
wealth. Antonio’s hassling of Shylock over his Judaism inflicts in Shylock a
deep burning desire beyond wealth-- revenge. Here we see Shakespeare presenting
desires in their ‘negative’ connotation. Despite risk of his own life, Antonio
is willing to stick by the law or ‘justice’ of his deal with Shylock to give
away a pound of his flesh. When Antonio is offered his share of the money in
the end, his only wish is that Shylock converts to Christianity and that his
will entitles Lorenzo and Jessica to his estate. This, religion and
relationships, to him is more important than material wealth. Shylock
constantly mentions mistreatment because of his religion – revenge particularly
in the dialogue about Jews being humans.
Love and/or marriage is presented in The Merchant of Venice through the two
women, Portia and Jessica, who each end up happily with their men. But both
have placed such a high value upon their desire for the materialistic symbolism
of a ring to signify their love. This desire complicates the pure love they
have into something more societal influenced and tangible. These societal
expectations versus one’s individual desires will be looked at more in depth in
Romeo & Juliet. Love is beginning to appear as a social construct beyond
just a ‘pure’ romantic relationship, even though we are still left with the cliché
‘happy ending’. The women’s desire for this material ring is so strong they use
a manipulative advantage to trick Bassanio and Gratiano into breaking their
promise and surrendering their rings out of some weird control static.: “I’ll
see if I can get my husband’s ring, Which I did make him swear to keep for
ever.”
The longing for love is very prominent
throughout the story, furthermore the forbidden love story between Lorenzo and
Jessica, despite her marriage boundaries (casket game) set by Shylock they are
determined to make the love for each other work. In the end, Antonio’s ships
turn out to be ok and his fortune secured, but his emotional discontent
prevails.
This play offers loads of ways of looking at the relation between material and affective desires; this is a great choice for your blog post. The challenge, of course, is selecting and focusing so that your post presents a unified argument. You do a nice job of showing how Antonio distinguishes between material and emotional concerns. Seldom do we see any clear lines drawn between the two, however. If you build your other claims up from the evidence, they might have a bit more traction.
ReplyDelete