The first
part of Henry IV is rife with characters navigating and shifting their
identities. Whether Prince Hal is stepping back from his title and casually
drinking with his friends, Falstaff is attempting to impersonate a nobleman, or
Hotspur is presenting himself as boldly as possible to intimidate his enemies,
Shakespeare's characters alter their language and actions to assume whatever
role they see fit.
Much of the discussion of identity in Henry IV, pt. 1 comes from Harry,
the problem-child prince and protagonist of the play, shifting his speech and
behavior to highlight or down-play his regal status. As a general rule in
Shakespeare, prose is spoken by commoners or characters in casual settings,
while verse is reserved for nobility. Prince Hal, heir to the throne and also a
frequenter or seedy taverns and brothels, slips seamlessly between the two
modes of speech. When talking and joking among his “commoner” friends Hal
speaks in verse, and in political situations he is able to switch to iambic pentameter
faster than Falstaff can down a beer. In Act II he brags that he "is so good a proficient in one quarter, I can drink with any tinker in his own language,”(Act II, sc 4 ll. 15-17) a shrewd skill for
any politician to have whether in Shakespeare’s time or today. Hal does not
allow his identity to be isolated to any one facet – he is not defined solely
by his ancestry and title of prince, nor is he simply a rogue who is only
capable of drinking and soliciting whores. He instead walks the line between
the two, or rather leaps from one side to another, with deftness and speed that
keeps audiences and other characters wondering what he will do (or become)
next.
Prince Hal’s fat, drunk, but ultimately loyal friend and character foil Falstaff
is somewhat more limited in his identity. He of course has no title or noble
graces to fall back on, but still makes attempts to mythologize himself using
his language and dishonesty. He refers to himself in the third-person a great
deal, which allows him to place an idea of himself in the minds of others
whether for the sake of humor or trickery. A notable example of this third-person reference is when Falstaff refers to himself as "sweet Jack Falstaff, kind Jack Falstaff, true Jack Falstaff, valiant Jack Falstaff" (Act II, sc 4 ll. 458-460).
Considering that so much of Henry IV pt. 1’s plot is based on
primogeniture and the consequential dynamics between fathers and sons and the
other men in their lives, it is unsurprising that this is not one of
Shakespeare’s plays that features strong-identitied women. Though there are
only 3 consequential female characters in the play, their identities are very
much impacted by the language they use and their relationships to other men. Lady
Percy, arguably the most prominent of these women, expresses discontent with
lack of attention from her husband, indicating her identity as a wife as well
as her husband’s hyper masculinity.
Henry IV is a prime example of how title and political motivation simply
add another dimension and level of complexity to identity rather than define
it. Prince Hal as well as the other characters use language and actions to navigate
and perform these facets of identity, ensuring that there is never a dull
moment for the people of Henry’s England or for Shakespeare’s audiences.
I like the content of this post, and I agree that this play affords several ways to explore the plasticity of identity. I find the paragraphs a little thin on evidence, and what evidence you do present could go a little further. For instance, we know that in the quotation where Falstaff describes himself, he's speaking in Hal's voice. What does this say about their relationship, Falstaff's loyalty, or the problem of identity in the play?
ReplyDelete