Critical Concepts Special Blog Post Focusing on Identity
by Rosalind Seidel
Marks Sicherman,
Carol. "King Hal: The Integrity of Shakespeare's Portrait." Texas
Studies
in Literature and Language
21.4 (1979): 503-21. JSTOR. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40754588>.
In
her article “King Hal: The Integrity of Shakespeare’s Portrait,” Carol Marks
Sicherman introduces a lot of interesting and insightful discussion points on
one of William Shakespeare’s characters, Prince Hal from the history plays Henry IV and Henry V. Sicherman begins her exposition of Prince Hal by stating
that ultimately, by the time he reaches and assumes the role of king, Hal faces
a reconciliation of his multiple selves. Hal, explains Sicherman, took up these
selves in an effort to penetrate the role of royalty foisted upon him with
elements of other realities he creates. Hal carries out a variety of parts that
make him seem more so like “a series of figures in a kaleidoscope” than one
individual. However, Sicherman argues that despite all the different forms of
identity Hal adopts, the array of personalities he assumes are indeed assisting
him in his development towards becoming one individual person.
I
found Sicherman’s ideas on the character of Hal and the identities he
personates particularly interesting because for me, I saw all of Hal’s
different identifies as just that – different. They were not something that I
believed to be encompassing or characteristic of one individual person. To my
understanding the way that Hal functioned in terms of identity was with extreme
plasticity. Instead of considering Hal’s identities as part of him, I distanced
them and regarded them as something outside of Hal himself that he simply
assumed to serve as a means to an end in which he himself could benefit from
disguising the truth of the station to which he was born. In Sicherman’s
article she brings up a point that I had not even considered important to
identity, which is the manner in which Hal talks depending on his identities.
Also, the manner in which people refer to Hal and address him shifts
accordingly. The manner in address and language alike signifies who Hal appears
to be.
Not
only does language serve to reveal who Hal is, Sicherman argues, but it also
unmasks who it is he is becoming because of his multifaceted identities. Going
back to Sicherman’s concept of Hal’s many identities fostering the development
of a singular person, she discusses Hal’s taking on of identities in a manner
of evolution. Hal is first seen shaping identity for imitation, then later
persuasion. After some time is Hal at a point at which the extensions of his
identity become idealized characters and his portrayals of them. They are not
who Hal is per se, but at the same time are because they are because they are
what has allowed for the shaping and growth of his character. Through his use
of disguise, Hal has established values that are rooted in his own personal
integrity which are present even through they may seem submerged beneath
artifice. I find Sicherman’s ideas particularly fascinating because I had not
considered the depths to the identities Hal adopts beyond their surface value
and how they served to his benefit in someway. I considered his assumed
identities to be something ephemeral rather than substantial.
I'm sure this article was quite helpful to your thinking about identity in general and Prince Hal's identity in particular. Be careful when using such old sources though--this article was published 35 years ago!!
ReplyDelete