“It make of monsters and things indigest such
cherubins as your sweet self resemble, creating every bad a perfect best.”
-Sonnet 115 on
Transformation
Hal, now with the adorned title of King Henry, has become a
radically transformed character. He has thrown in the towel on his tavern-drinking
buddies in exchange for leadership and political responsibility. This new role
has drawn a significant line between personal and Kingly desire that raises the
question: Can personal desire honestly exist
within this politic? Could Henry V’s desires have changed this drastically in
such a short amount of time? And, is this change good or bad? Twice in Henry V, Henry disguises himself as a
common person. This acting reveals an apparent division between the two selves/identities
Henry holds within himself, an inner conflict between them, and a division
between King/politic and the commonwealth. Despite his lack of loyalty towards
his old friends, Henry proves his worthiness of the crown through strict
adherence to loyalty of England and the adherence to satisfy the people of the
land. He is no doubt a fearless and often inspiring ruler. This new responsibility
generally seems to satisfy him. But the success of power, seems to mean the
loss of oneself or individuality.
When it comes to accomplishing what he believes is righteous,
nothing comes in Henry’s way. This brute determination leads to demission and
death to many, some of which he once called friends. While his morality is
questionable, his seriousness of his role as a King is steadfast. He is a just,
often portrayed heroic, King who pleads he is not motivated by lust, power, or
greed.
4.3.20. The Band of Brothers Speech:
“I am not covetous for gold, Nor care I who doth feed
upon my cost; it yearns me not if men my garments wear; such outward things
dwell not in my desires.”
Henry V seeks advising for many of his decisions, showing
his consideration for the happiness of the commonwealth (and maybe a little
insecurity with his new responsibility). While he speaks that his main ambition
is for peace, his murderous actions displayed in the war and even psychological
threats tell otherwise. War is simply the device for the attainment of his
desire. This division parallels this body-politic between his personal self and
his King self. Even when Dauphine and others mock him, he stays persistent to
his new role and naturally abandons his old self-indulgent ways cold turkey.
Beyond his pride as King, Henry V displays a greater goal to
leave behind a legacy; his own permanent mark upon England’s history. He views
going to war as a noble deed. (quote) Henry visualizes the legacy marked on the
gravestones of all the men who fought and died, a relic that will be told for
generations to come. Similarly to before, this desire is outward of himself, or
rather an extension of himself. Henry appears to be doing what he believes is
the best he possibly can. He has a big shoe to fill and a lot of making up to
do, but he proves himself worthy as a King. While Henry is pursuing the best
for the land, one must be wearisome where the divide between the law and people
actually stand. A good King should not only take into consideration his own
people, but foster peace among nations as well.
I like this exploration of King Henry's disguised tour of the camp as a function of his desire to be once again a private self and how that desire is eclipsed by the kingly desire to leave a legacy. It looks like what you posted might be a draft, as there are markers indicating you intended to include quotations where there aren't any.
ReplyDelete